[Login] or [Signup]
Login
Username:
Password:
[Signup]
[Recover Account]

Navigation

Poll


You must be logged in to view polls
Bowie General > Images Vol. 33

You are in:  Forums / Bowie General / Images Vol. 33
Locked
homebrewPosted at 2025-08-02 14:19:13(1 wk ago) (Bowie General / Images Vol. 33)


Uploaded: 152.57 GB
Downloaded: 375.96 GB
Posts: 139

Ratio: 0.41
Location: United States of America


These articles appear just as they were posted in the Usenet group alt.fan.david-bowie by group member Jamie Soule aka AladINSAnE. I have made no attempt to alter the formatting, spelling, grammar or edit in any way.

IMAGES: PART 33


I tell my kids that when I was their age, my boy is 13 and my daughter
18 by the way, oh, how rude., they do have names, Michael and Nico, I
tell them I did not have a home computer. They look at me and you can
just tell what they're are thinking. Why, are you crazy? How could you
NOT have one. There is a look of horror as they realize that meant life
without Nintendo and or the Net. No calculators  either I add. How did
you do your math then is the look. No channel changers, no remote
controls for anything actually. You can't mean you did it by hand, get
up every time to change a channel or switch cd's? There were no cd's.
They believe we had dinosaurs walking around when I was their ages. To
those of you who are reading this and in your late teens, your twenties
or early thirties you may not remember that there was once a world
without MTV. You never consider that, do you? Why should you anyway, you
grew up with it, and besides, there really is no reason to. Well, until
now that is, because the history of MTV is crucial to understanding the
importance of what Bowie did in 79. First of all though, do any of you
know when MTV started?

Stage was a surprise in Britain, it went to number five on the charts.
Elsewhere though, Bowie's sales were either flat or declining. March of
1979 found Bowie once again in America, New York to be specific, along
with him was Tony Visconti. Bowie wrote the lyrics to Lodger during this
time, and together with Visconti also did the final mix to the album.
Lodgers was finished.

For those of you who still doubt the marketing abilities of Tony
Defries, here is one more thing. He understood how "fickle" the "public"
are, prone to blindly follow trends and easy to manipulate. "Video is
the way to sell records," he stated in the early seventies, and once
again he was proven right. The answer by the way is 1981, prior to that
there WAS NO SUCH THING AS MTV. It is difficult, yes even for me, to
imagine a world that was void of music videos because they are so
prevalent now. They are EVERYWHERE you look. Even so they are a
relatively "new" medium, because prior to 81 they were few and far
between, and this is something that you must understand. Nobody, save a
few, made them. Record companies, marketing and advertising agencies, as
well as most artists saw NO VALUE in them, either as an artistic medium,
or a marketing platform. It was determined they were not worth the cost.

This point I agree is arguable, but the first foray into what could be
accurately described as a "music video" was in 1967, done by the
Beatles. The videos were made for Penny Lane and Strawberry Fields
Forever. The Beatles themselves were the  reason the record companies
invested their funds into these videos, as well as the feature films
based around The Beatle's music such as Yellow Submarine, and did not do
so for other artists. You see, The Beatles made incredible profits for
their labels, therefore almost any expenses incurred to promote them
could be justified, and this was not true of other artists. The world
would not see another music video until late in 1975. This one made by
the band Queen, and directed by Bruce Gowers, on a 5,000 pound budget.
The video Bohemian Rhapsody earned fantastic royalties, even so, video
never caught on. What caught Bowie's eye were the very few bands who
tried mixing film and music in clips lasting a few minutes, Devo being
one. The power of TV to sell music had long been recognized by the music
industry executives, though not through the use of music videos. The
first musical broadcast goes back to 1930, a performance by composer
George Gershwin. The real marketing power however came from the "dance
shows" such as Dick Clarke's American Bandstand, a staple for teenagers
since the sixties, and Your Hit Parade. Bowie had experimented with film
in the late sixties, while still managed by Kenneth Pitt. This was for a
self produced special designed for TV. The film, titled  Love You Till
Tuesday, consisted of visual impressions of some of his songs such as
When I'm Five, Space Oddity, The Ching A Ling Song as well as a few
others. There was also a mime routine included, and this is the only
known film in existence showing Bowie performing mime while studying
with the renowned Lindsay Kemp. It is worth seeing.

Devo caught Bowie's attention in 1977, and in 1979 Bowie convinced the
"suits" at RCA, between rounds of their ongoing battle I imagine, to
underwrite the financing that would enable Bowie to produce three music
videos from tracks that appeared on Lodger. How significant was this?
Well, look. This was in 79, TWO YEARS BEFORE MTV EVEN EXISTED, NOBODY
WAS MAKING MUSIC VIDEOS. Do you see now what a truly significant move
this was on the part of Bowie and RCA once you start looking back on
history. Bowie is NEVER credited for his contribution to the advent of
music videos. Why? Because people don't learn their history, and this is
exactly why this fact is overlooked by THE MAJORITY of Bowie fans.
COMPLETELY MISSED! I hear Bowie fans constantly spouting off on the fact
that they consider David Bowie to be a genius. I say to them, "What
about his contribution to the medium of music videos?" The reply, "What
contribution?" Yeah, right, he was only one of the founders of it. No
big deal I suppose. Well, maybe to you, I thankfully happen to be a lot
different though.

Here we have Bowie once again demonstrating a powerful example of his
abilities as a multi faceted artist, able to use not one, but many
different mediums in order to convey his personality and thoughts to his
audience. Bowie was an innovator, and one of the pioneers that actually
began "rock videos," and as before the ENTIRE MUSIC INDUSTRY eventually
caught on and followed his lead. This is another prime example without
question of David Bowie being YEARS ahead of his time. It is also a
prime example of the power of Bowie's work, and don't you EVER
underestimate that fact, because it would leave you looking rather
silly. Why? Well, if you think for a minute at what Bowie did in 79 with
regards to video, as he did with music on Low and other pieces of his
work, he literally CHANGED THE COURSE OF MODERN MUSIC FOREVER. How many
others have had such an impact on music as Bowie has? I count none.

Bowie chose David Mallet to direct all three videos. Mallet had
experience from American TV, he worked on two innovative "dance music"
shows in the sixties, Shindig and Hullabaloo. When Bowie hooked up with
him in 79 he was the director of Kenny Everett's series, which Bowie
appeared on the same year. Now, I have a serious problem at times, and
that is with "credits.," ones that appear on films, albums, or anything
else for that matter. Why? Well, I am just too fucking curious, that is
why. See, you read a credit, maybe it says something like this for
example, "Director - David Mallet, Co-Director - David Bowie."  Sorry,
that is just NOT good enough for me because it is not explanatory
enough. You see, I want to know EXACTLY what EACH ONE contributed to the
the project. In this case I have used as an example, I WANT TO KNOW
EXACTLY WHAT BOWIE DID, how much, and what was it really that he
contributed. If you think that I am TOO curious, well, sorry, because
that is how I happen to "learn" things, and I won't ever apologize for
using my brain. I know a few who should try it sometimes. It is because
of this curiosity that I watched the three videos from Lodger quite a
few times over the past three days. It was during this time that I
started to wonder about how much input Bowie had in the making of them,
because I had no idea. I did not know whose ideas were used to write
the "story lines" for example, Bowie, Mallet or someone else. Who came
up with the theme for the sets? Did Bowie have any input as to how the
parts were acted, or filmed. As a person who attempts to understand the
entire scope of Bowie's talents, these are extremely important questions
to me, and ones that surprisingly I had never considered before. These
questions arose only because of writing Images.

You know me, I am relentless, and this was no exception. Nothing remains
unanswered if I can help it, so away I went the other day. The "vaults"
were opened, a process I now do alone, as I was sure the answer to all
my questions lay somewhere inside. I do not go through my Bowie stuff
anymore with anyone else around who is not a die hard, and the reason is
that my girlfriend, as well as most of my friends, will no longer
tolerate it. The fact is that as I go through decades of what they call
"that stuff," and, I find items that I have not seen for some time, a
few I forgot I even  had." The shear "excitement" of rediscovering many
of these important artefacts causes me to want to "share" their value
with others. Hey, have I ever shown you this picture? See, a press
release photo from 76, Slick AND Ronson together?  The reply, " I think
so." Well, look. Oh, fuck, Rolling Stone, 76, Cameron Crowe interview
with Bowie. I am going to read you THE WHOLE THING. It's great. Now,
listen. The David Bowie Black Book. Here, I'll show you something. Page
101. There, see.? That is MY FAVOURITE picture of Bowie, look at the
hair. The reply, " I have seen that. You show it to me every week." Oh,
do I? Sorry.  Hey, 87 tour program. Did I tell you how much I hated that
fucking tour. "Yep, two or three times a day." See this 76 program? Try
and find one of these. Oh, you can get the program, but try and find the
envelope they came in along with it. See, DAVID BOWIE - ISOLAR. It took
me over twenty years to find one. After that show in 76 I went right
past the program vendors and out the fucking door. Idiot, eh? I paid
$30.00 for this one, I would have paid $500.00. "Knowing you you would
have paid a lot more if you had to," they say. How do you know? "You
tell me that every day pretty much." ReallY? That much? Oh. Can you
believe this, some guy on our newsgroup sent me this as a present, a 78
tour program from Australia. He just gave it to me. "I saw it." When?
"Once last week, three times the previous week, and around twelve times
last month alone just for starters." Hmmm? Look! "I know, a Glass Spider
promotional frisbee." I showed you that? "Many times."  Ahhhh, Station
To Sta.... "Japanese pressing,. Right?' Well, uh... "And you have an
original on vinyl, and a Ryko, and a Ryko AU20 Remaster, and the
standard RCA issue cd, and every other pressing of that album that is
know to exist in the known universe, and you have six cd's and two vinyl
copies of the Nassau boot because you would commit suicide if you ever
lost it. I know, make sure you are buried with the AU20,  the Nassau,
Rotterdam and Cleveland boots. Oh, and the 76 tour program." I told you
all this already I guess. "Yeah, several million times." Well, curiosity
they say killed the cat, and mine was no where in sight as the boxes
were opened, in a ritual reminiscent of what one would expect to see if
something priceless was handed to the unworthy. The mood was one of
reverence and humility as I rummaged through countless fucking boxes,
piles of magazines, newspapers, and every other known source of Bowie
interviews in the hopes of finding some comment from Bowie on the making
of the videos from Lodger. Finally, three o'clock in the morning,
September 1980, New Musical Express. The search had ended.

It isn't much, but it is enough. I had no idea, as I said, to the extent
of Bowie's contribution to these videos, or if everything was left in
fact to David Mallet. What I read was sufficient enough to cause me to
never look at one particular video the same way again, I now have  a
much greater respect for it after what I learned.  The role that David
Bowie had in the making of the videos on Lodger seems to me now to have
been a lot larger than I had anticipated. It seems that Mallet's
expertise was needed basically from a technical perspective, in order to
be able to put BOWIE'S IDEAS on to film. I am getting a little ahead of
myself here, but I want to bring this up now. This interview reveals
little about Bowie's input on the Lodger videos, except that the ideas
were Bowie's, and  Mallet was left in charge of how to express what
Bowie wanted to on video. What really got my attention however was when
Bowie went on to talk about his work with Mallet on the Ashes To Ashes
video, and it is this video that I will never look at the same way
again. It has always been my favourite Bowie video in the first place,
but truthfully I never really gave Bowie the credit he personally
deserves for it. I was under the impression, for some unknown reason,
that the story line, direction, and the film sequences were probably the
work of many, and Bowie's role a lesser one. I could not have been more
mistaken, and I will let Bowie explain. Here is an except from that
interview for you that I have taken from the New Musical Express. The
words are David Bowie's, so here you go. "The three video's that were
done for Lodger were codirections inasmuch as I gave David (Mallet)
complete control over what I wanted to put in there. But this one
(speaking about the Ashes To Ashes video) I story - boarded myself,
actually drew it frame for frame. He edited it exactly as I wanted it
and has allowed me to say publicly that it was my first direction. I've
always wanted to direct and this is a good place to start - to get some
money from a record company and then go away and sort of play with it."
I admit that even though I think that I am quite aware of David Bowie's
abilities, I was surprised when I read this. It is fascinating to me how
a video of this calibre, which I consider one of the best music videos
ever made by any artist, was taken from a CONCEPT, to a SCRIPT, and then
ACTED and DIRECTED in, and after to a FINAL EDIT BY BOWIE HIMSELF, and
this was his FIRST ATTEMPT. All I can say is MORE PLEASE.

I hate music videos. I hate MTV, and I hate all music video channels.
MTV, MINDLESS AND TOTALLY VOID is what it should stand for. It is a
fucking insult to anyone who has an ounce of intelligence. Music TV my
ass, it DESTROYED MUSIC. It is a BLIGHT, a PLAGUE, and an INSULT to art.
MTV is for the brain dead where art and intelligence are concerned, oh,
and this IS NOT MY OPINION either. Prove it? My pleasure. When it comes
to studying any art form there is one common perception that must be
shared by everyone, regardless. What is that? INTERPRETATION. This
applies to music, painting, sculpture, architecture, dance, and any
other form of artistic expression. What is created by an artist has a
meaning, it is an expression, a form of communication. Art is designed
to cause a reaction by evoking EMOTION in those who view it. Art is not
only viewed, but FELT as well, that is if it is worth anything. Listen
to Warszawa. What does it mean to you? In all probability each person
gets a different experience listening to it. I have experienced a wide
variety of different emotions from the same piece of music. One of the
greatest joys a person can get from the appreciation of music is the
fact that through individual interpretation music can become personal.
The best way to illustrate this is to ask you about your own personal
experiences with music.  Mostly all of you have certain pieces of music
that are "deeply personal" to you in some way or another. The ones I am
referring to are those that made an emotional impression on you so deep
that they really mean something to you. Sometimes we may hear what an
artist writes and then say to ourselves, " What that song says is
EXACTLY how I FEEL, I could have written that myself. He understands
things the way I do." Music can often help get us through the "rough
spots" we experience in life. It can bring joy if it reminds us of
something good, because we associate it with certain experiences or
moments in our lives. Likewise, it can bring us sorrow, even pain..

I ask you this simple question. Why can a piece of music be deeply
personal to you, and the same piece mean nothing special to me? The
answer is interpretation, and because we are each different as people,
we interpret art in our "OWN" unique and individual way. Now, lets use
Teenage Wildlife here, just because I really like it. Hear that Buffer
if you are reading this? To me this song invokes feelings of a loss of
innocence as one matures from adolescence into adulthood. When we are
younger we have hopes in a world that looks bright with prospects,
adventure. It is something to seize, to leave our stamp on.
Unfortunately, reality sets in, you find yourself in a jungle, and it is
every man for himself. Instead of prospects, the goal is survival. The
world you discover is not what you thought, it is mean. To you it may
have been what was playing in your car when you picked up a girl on a
date that you didn't think would go out with you. You got up the nerve,
and expecting a rejection, you asked and she agreed to go out with you.
What's more, it really worked out, you stayed together. Every time you
hear Teenage Wildlife it reminds you of the time she got into your car,
and how  happy and terrified you were at the same time. If you are
Buffer, a friend of mine, when you hear Teenage Wildlife then you turn
off your cd player and go and  bitch and complain on the news group
about how much you loathe that song, only to have me tell you that you
are quite mental. Now, suppose THE FIRST TIME you heard Teenage Wildlife
was on TV when you saw the video for it. This is all hypothetical of
course. The video depicted a high school, and a group of rather
"straight" kids, more the "art" type who would pursue things with an
intellectual flavour, rather than weapons. This group is being
relentlessly harassed by another group in the school who harbour a
vendetta against these people, and who are determined to lay something
of a "shit kicking" on them, if they can get them in an isolated area.
The video has depicted a cat and mouse game between these two groups
from the beginning, however the ones "hunted" find an escape route every
time they seem to be cornered. One day however one of the boys stays
behind after school, it is late and the building is almost deserted,
sitting at a desk in a room alone he glances up at the window in the
door. It is there he sees a face, the face of one who has been chasing
him for so long.  This happens as you hear the line, "What shall I do?
They wait for me in the hallway." Then he realizes that he is trapped.
"They move in numbers, they've got me in a corner. I feel like a group
of one. Oh, no. They can't do this to me. I'm not some piece of Teenage
Wildlife." The scenes in the video play out as the intended victim,
"Howls like a wolf in a trap," only to see his assailants enter through
the now broken door. The first hand to strike him causes him to, "Fall
to the ground like a leaf from a tree," catching a glimpse out the
window on the way down, " Looks outside at that vast blue sky." Now, I
need not progress any further with a story line here, you get the idea.

There are of course many different ways in which we can gain exposure to
a piece of music for the first  time. However, unlike before, the way a
piece is  interpreted now depends not only on our own imaginations, but
is controlled to a large extent by the medium that brought us the music.
The "freedom" of thought which allows each person to interpret what they
hear in their own unique and individual way, is also restricted to a
great extent by the way music is delivered to us these days. I have
fabricated this Teenage Wildlife video "story line" for a reason, I want
to illustrate a point about two mediums most commonly used to broadcast
music, and their effects as to the way we receive it.  You have never
heard Teenage Wildlife. Your first exposure to the song comes one night
while you are sitting at home watching MTV or some other program with an
identical format. You happen to like what you hear, how couldn't you,
and so you pay close attention to the video that is playing. The song
happens to come up in conversation one day, and the person you are
talking to asks you what is the song about. What is you answer? The
person who asked will be given by you no doubt, a brief synopsis of what
you saw in the video. The person who asked will now know that the David
Bowie song Teenage Wildlife is about a conflict between two different
groups of teenagers. You know this because that is what you were "told"
it was about.

There is no comparison. You are either listening to the radio, at a
friend's house or you just purchased Scary Monsters and this is you
first listen. Robert Fripp's guitar grabs you and holds you while Bowie
asks, "How come you only want tomorrow?"  "Wow," you think. Several
minutes later Bowie declares, "Each to his own,"  the instrumental
tracks overlaid with stunning falsettos of "WILD" fade and the song
ends. You may listen again. You may listen many times, you may read the
lyrics. What is this song about? The answer is what makes the music we
adore "personal" to each one of us. It is entirely up to you what it is
about. You can defend music videos and MTV all you want, I could care
less, but you will never convince me that MTV has not damaged music and
those who watch it. To those like me who are disciplined to use video
shows for finding  "information," tours, new releases and news, then it
is relatively safe. I pity those however who are on a steady diet of MTV
because you are exposing yourself to something which causes atrophy of
the mind, and this is dangerous. Unfortunately it isn't difficult to
find people who have been stricken with this avoidable condition, if you
just look around you, they are everywhere.

What MTV has basically done is robbed you thought. It has also stolen
the adventures that lead to wonderful new discoveries when we listen to
something. How? Well, you don't think for the simple reason that you do
not have to,  MTV has removed every reason to use your mind because it
TELLS you what to think. The songs which appear on MTV are exactly about
what the video TELLS YOU THEY ARE ABOUT. What is terrifying to me is
that the messages conveyed in ninety nine percent of these "works of art
on celluloid," rates as some of the most mindless drivel that I have
ever encountered. I am at a loss as to how people can watch this shit
day after day. Really at a loss. Sex.  Women.. Yep, tits, ass, beautiful
hair, full lips and all dressed up the same. The skill that costume
designers must posses in the music video industry is how to get the
least amount of clothes on a women so that all of her "attributes" are
visible, yet cover enough so that the video does not get rated as
pornographic and banned. The women's "equal rights" organizations are
hypocrites because they are "selective" in who they target. The
magazines like Playboy, Penthouse and Hustler, as well as companies and
advertising agencies who feature scantily clad females in their
publications and advertising campaigns all come under attack. Does the
music video industry? No. Why is that, because as far as I can determine
they are the WORST offenders of portraying women as "objects." Most
women in these videos have probably been "manufactured" for the most
part by the Dow Chemical Company who manufacturer 44 D's, and are
walking testimonials to the things that can be accomplished by the
practitioners of plastic surgery. The bodies of these women are
displayed in such a fashion so that they are viewed as "toys for boys,"
and not as that of a "person."  In an attempt to further enhance the
image of these women as "toys," they are in most cases portrayed as
having only enough of a brain to maintain life support. These "women,"
when adorned with the most minimum amount of fabric legally allowed
radiate one message only. The message is, "I bet you want to fuck me,"

Getting people interested in fucking something is an example of a
brilliant marketing strategy used by the record labels, who are
responsible for these videos. It isn't just the women. Have you noticed
that most front men for bands these days are "cute." I have. If not,
then make up and wardrobe try their darndest to "fix" the problem. There
is a reason for that as well, it is so they also send a message. The
message? Well, it's, "I bet you want to fuck me." First, I want to make
it perfectly clear that I have no information at all  from any research
or studies that have been done by the advertising industry to support
what I am going to say. It is my opinion and I base it on what I feel is
common sense. I believe that the average person will devote much of
their time and, pay close attention to things that they want to fuck. I
also believe that the average person will allot a sizeable amount of
their available cash to be used to purchase icons of things they want to
fuck, if for some reason they are unable to get their hands on it.  You
see, the sex drive of teenagers and those in their twenties, the segment
of the population targeted by MTV, will make them tuned in to these
videos if they "like" what they see. In an effort to "get close" to the
things they like, people will spend large amounts of money on icons
which resemble these things, such as records, pictures, posters, videos
and magazines. Record labels for The Beatles, Bay City Rollers,
Backstreet Boys, Jennifer Lopez, Britanny Spears, Spice Girls, and
thousands more have used sex to sell the work of the artists they have
under contract. Again, I do not get it. How can one watch this stuff for
extended periods of time on a consistent bases. Boy loves girl, girl
loves boy, girl gets boy, boy gets girl, boy leaves girl, girl leaves
boy, girl cheats on boy, boy cheats on girl, girl misses boy, boy misses
girl. On, and on and on it goes, the same redundant stories over and
over again, and the only difference between them is that the cute boys
and half naked mindless women are rotated for each video. Doesn't this
endless repetition become "tiring" after awhile? My exposure to these
video stations is not governed by choice, but more because my mind can
only take so much abuse.

The freedom of thought is the greatest tool an individual possesses
because it allows a person to "go anywhere."  The progress made by
scientists, inventions, medical breakthroughs, a better understanding of
the universe and space exploration itself are all made possible by one
thing, free thinking. Music, dance, theatre, film, literature all have
their roots in the same place, the realm of free thought. Free thought
is the ability which allows us the gift to interpret music and the arts
and it is decimated by MTV. Now, hear me out on this. You may think that
I am over reacting to the effects that MTV has on people by destroying
free thinking. Let me tell you that you would be quite correct, if it
was ONLY MTV, but unfortunately this is not the case at all, and far
from it as a matter of fact. There are many powerful things that we are
exposed to on a daily basis which are just as bad, and in many in some
cases much worse, than MTV. If you add up all of these things which have
a detrimental effect on an individual's ability, or  their freedom to
"stretch" out their imaginations, then you have a very serious problem.
I am of the belief that this problem is not one that we are heading for,
but one we already have. I believe also that the gravity of this problem
is not benign, or one that is temporary when left unadressed. My opinion
is that instead this problem isit is an acute one and it is getting
progressively more critical because for some reason it does not appear
to be recognized as a problem in our society. What terrifies me however,
is that I think this problem  has been recognized, and as a severe one,
yet the response has been to simply ignore it. If anyone wonders why
this is such a concern to me, and should be to most, is the fact that
with the loss of free thinking eventually comes the loss of
"individuality," and when these two are lost it means the demise, and
eventual end of creativity. I do not believe that I have to go into the
ramifications that a loss of creativity would have on society as a
whole. The problem has already manifest itself quite clearly I believe
in the arts, as I do not believe we have anything even close to the
amount of quality output from artists compared to twenty years ago.
There isn't much "new" anymore, in any area, yet whole civilizations
used to be built with the arts as their centrepiece. Bowie quipped in an
interview I have from 1981 saying, "Art is dead, so what the Hell can we
do about it anyway." I will not bother to explore the things that I am
convinced have deeply harmed free thinking in our society as I could
write a book about them, and truthfully I would really like to do that
one day.

I greatly admire the artists who are able to successfully merge their
music with film or video. The art of showing a collage of images in
conjunction to music stimulates both the visual and audio senses, and
can result in a very powerful emotional experience for the viewer. Now,
I can hear some of you shouting that I am a hypocrite, accusing me of
self contradiction because earlier I said that I basically loathed most
music videos. Well, I do. What I am referring to are visual images that
are used to create sensations while still leaving room for individual
interpretation. Where as music videos tell you what to think by
dictating a story, these "films" only add to the experience of
individual interpretation by adding a visual experience. What is
wonderful is that in most instances the visual images presented ARE ALSO
open to individual interpretation. There are so few artists who do this
so it is not easy to find names, but let me try. Okay, now. Hmmmmm? Let
me see.  Ummmm. There, David Bowie, that's one. Have you seen the Heroes
video?

AlaDINsaNE

To be added to again...............


""I don't begrudge any artist for finding an audience"
- David Bowie abt. 1987
Report This Post Go to the top of the page
 
dag97Posted at 2025-08-02 16:08:18(1 wk ago) (Bowie General / Images Vol. 33)


Uploaded: 5.30 TB
Downloaded: 2.71 TB
Posts: 22

Ratio: 1.96
Location: United Kingdom


Thank you

Report This Post Go to the top of the page
 

<< Prev  1   Next >>

Locked
You are not permitted to post in this forum.

Latest Forum Posts
Latest Topic TitleRepliesViewsAuthorLast Post
Images Vol. 34016homebrewby homebrew
2025-08-09 13:55:41
Health Issues7610579Steveboyby Besomdave
2025-08-09 09:31:20
I Can’t Give Everything Away13761Portlandbillby ayres
2025-08-09 00:25:40
David Bowie | Live on Musikladen Extra | Complete Show | 2025 Restoration by Nacho9245learmby Portlandbill
2025-08-07 17:27:17
VIDEO from Dutch TV show 'Fan Club' in November 19671206MEXMODby Moony
2025-08-05 21:56:00
Images Vol. 331194homebrewby dag97
2025-08-02 16:08:18
How to do a new post3625steve23yhby steve23yh
2025-07-29 17:00:20
New recording - Sigma Sound Studios in 1974518078hanoirocksby ayres
2025-07-29 16:28:57
Bob Lefsetz podcast with Mike Garson0244surflingby surfling
2025-07-27 10:59:24
Images Vol. 320250homebrewby homebrew
2025-07-26 15:31:10
Unofficial Ryko 8CD set8332406Steveboyby ayres
2025-07-23 19:21:37
Images Vol. 311412homebrewby professormouse
2025-07-22 12:05:08
Dancing in the Streets ("GREATEST Music Video of All Time") video restoration9608Cheesusby professormouse
2025-07-19 14:56:56
where are the box sets?495933ayresby professormouse
2025-07-17 03:52:21
Run Piper run - ya rehearsal tracks14800Ballhausby professormouse
2025-07-15 09:43:05


Online Users

Newest Members
Modified by JanErik |- Page Generated In 0.067980 secs.
-|- RSS Feed -|- Feed Info
Theme Base By: Nikkbu | Modified by: paperdragon | Graphics by: MossGarden
Email: bowiestation(AT)bowiestation.com